Unlock the Editor’s Digest without spending a dime
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
The variety of lively enterprise capital buyers has dropped greater than 1 / 4 from a peak in 2021, as risk-averse monetary establishments focus their cash on the largest companies in Silicon Valley.
The tally of VCs investing in US-headquartered firms dropped to six,175 in 2024 — which means greater than 2,000 have fallen dormant since a peak of 8,315 in 2021, in response to knowledge supplier PitchBook.
The development has concentrated energy amongst a small group of mega-firms and has left smaller VCs in a struggle for survival. It has additionally skewed the dynamics of the US enterprise market, enabling start-ups comparable to SpaceX, OpenAI, Databricks and Stripe to remain non-public for much longer, whereas thinning out funding choices for smaller firms.

Greater than half of the $71bn raised by US VCs in 2024 was pulled in by simply 9 companies, in response to PitchBook. Basic Catalyst, Andreessen Horowitz, Iconiq Development and Thrive Capital raised greater than $25bn in 2024.
Many companies threw within the towel in 2024. Countdown Capital, an early-stage tech investor, introduced it will wind down and return uninvested capital to its backers in January. Foundry Group, an 18-year-old VC with about $3.5bn in belongings underneath administration, stated a $500mn fund raised in 2022 could be its final.
“There may be completely a VC consolidation,” stated John Chambers, former chief government of Cisco and the founding father of start-up funding agency JC2 Ventures.
“The large guys [like] Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia [Capital], Iconiq, Lightspeed [Venture Partners] and NEA might be wonderful and can proceed,” he stated. However he added that these enterprise capitalists who didn’t safe huge returns in a low-interest price atmosphere earlier than 2021 have been going to wrestle as “that is going to be a harder market”.
One issue is a dramatic slowdown in preliminary public choices and takeovers — the everyday milestones at which buyers money out of start-ups. That has staunched the stream of capital from VCs again to their “restricted companions” — buyers comparable to pension funds, foundations and different establishments.

“The time to return capital has elongated so much throughout the trade during the last 25 years,” stated an LP in plenty of giant US enterprise companies. “Within the Nineties it most likely took seven years to get your a refund. Now it’s most likely extra like 10 years.”
Some LPs have run out of persistence. The $71bn raised by US companies in 2024 is a seven-year low and fewer than two-fifths the entire haul in 2021.
Smaller, youthful enterprise companies have felt the squeeze most acutely, as LPs selected to allocate to these with an extended file and with whom they’ve pre-existing relationships, relatively than take a threat on new managers or those that have by no means returned capital to their backers.

“Nobody will get fired for placing cash into Andreessen or Sequoia Capital,” stated Kyle Stanford, lead VC analyst at PitchBook. “Should you don’t signal on [to invest in their current fund] you would possibly lose your spot within the subsequent one: that’s what you get fired for.”
Stanford estimated the failure price for mid-sized VCs would speed up in 2025 if the sector couldn’t discover a strategy to enhance its returns to LPs.
“VC is and can stay a rarefied ecosystem the place solely a choose cadre of companies persistently entry probably the most promising alternatives,” wrote 24-year-old enterprise agency Lux Capital to its LPs in August. “The overwhelming majority of latest individuals have interaction in what quantities to a monetary idiot’s errand. We proceed to anticipate the extinction of as many as 30-50 per cent of VC companies.”